Impact & Reports

Oppna resultat, tydliga prioriteringar och rapporter som gar att folja

Den har sidan samlar de viktigaste utfallen bakom hallprojektet pa Gardehov: anvandning, inkludering, ekonomi, partnerskap och de handlingar som visar hur beslut omsatts i faktisk nytta.

Las huvudrapporten Se rapportbiblioteket
Impact & Reports

Open outcomes, clear priorities, and reporting that can be followed

This page brings together the clearest signals behind the Gardehov hall project: usage, inclusion, finances, partnerships, and the reporting trail that shows how decisions turn into public value.

Read the flagship report View the report library
Flagship report

2025 impact report: access growth, capital discipline, and community confidence

The annual report ties every major claim to activity logs, board tracking, partner input, and spending oversight so stakeholders can review delivery rather than rely on broad summaries.

18,400

participant visits recorded across supported sessions and open hall blocks

31%

increase in shared-access hours used by schools, youth groups, and associations

94%

of board-owned actions closed within the approved operating cycle

Outcome dashboard

How funding translated into activity, readiness, and transparency

Reporting is structured around use of funds, who benefitted, and whether operational systems kept pace with project ambition.

Community access expanded through protected time blocks and lower-barrier booking 88%
Facility readiness strengthened with maintenance routines, steward coverage, and event protocols 76%
Donor and partner renewal remained strong where reporting was quarterly and variance was explained early 69%
Compliance and governance actions were tracked to closure with named owners and deadline control 94%
Report library

Four reporting tracks used by donors, residents, clubs, and public partners

Each track answers a different stakeholder question: what changed, who gained access, what it cost, and what still needs attention.

Community Reach Report

Tracks participant flow, repeat attendance, youth access, and the balance between established users and first-time groups.

Partnership Delivery Review

Summarizes collaboration with municipal teams, local associations, and funders, including commitments met and unresolved dependencies.

Inclusion and Safeguarding Update

Shows how stewards, booking rules, and on-site support improved the experience for younger participants and underrepresented groups.

Facility and Operations Memo

Focuses on uptime, maintenance, staffing coverage, incident handling, and the readiness of spaces tied to the Gardehov project.

Assurance documents

What makes the reporting credible

The strongest reports are backed by operating rules, named controls, and a clear record of who reviewed what.

REP-01

Quarterly Metrics Pack

Participation, booking spread, incident summaries, and operational variance notes shared with board members and funding partners.

REP-02

Procurement and Spend Log

Vendor comparisons, reserve use, and budget shifts logged so large decisions remain reviewable after approval.

REP-03

Access and Safeguarding Register

Evidence for how the project protects open participation, handles incidents, and closes follow-up actions.

REP-04

Board Resolution Archive

A decision trail connecting strategy, approvals, risk notes, and the operational actions that followed.

Impact in practice

One reporting cycle that changed how stakeholders evaluated progress

Before the reporting reset, updates were descriptive but hard to compare. The current model links the story, the figures, and the board actions in one structure.

1

Baseline

Stakeholders saw activity on the ground, but access equity, operating strain, and budget movement were difficult to trace over time.

2

Reporting shift

AFH introduced consistent quarterly packs, issue logs, and named corrective actions tied directly to board review.

3

Result

Donors renewed with clearer expectations, partners coordinated earlier, and residents could see how public-interest claims matched observable outcomes.

What stakeholders look for

The signals that make an impact report useful

Trust tends to rise when reports answer the next obvious question instead of stopping at headline numbers.

The useful part is not just the attendance number. It is seeing what changed in booking access after a board decision.

Helena Sjostedt Municipal partnership coordinator

When a variance is explained early, we can stay supportive even if delivery moves slower than first expected.

Martin Olofsson Private donor consortium member

The best reports show whether the hall feels more open in practice, not only whether a budget line was spent.

Fatima El Idrissi Youth program participant and volunteer
Next publications

Scheduled releases and public review points

AFH publishes reporting in predictable intervals so clubs, residents, and funders know when updated evidence will be available.

May

Quarterly access update with booking spread, community hours, and participant trend notes.

Aug

Mid-year finance and procurement memo with reserve commentary and delivery variance.

Dec

Year-end impact report with appendices, narrative outcomes, and governance follow-through.

Request a report pack

Stakeholders can request the latest impact summary, finance memo, or governance appendix pack for review and briefing purposes.

Questions about methodology, evidence sources, or report timing are routed through the AFH contact team.

Request documents